Reading Rating Complaints

I normally read posts from users that I have found to give very intelligent and insightful posts more that the occasional glance over one that catches my eye when meandering over the forums. I have noticed that there has been a downward sloping rating of particular users posts. Most of which are my most favorite to read, bunk, null, rosyxxx, harold_maude, andromacha, reallycooldude, not to mention just looking at the main page for the forums there is a noticable diffirence in ratings.

Off to a more meaningful place...

Well, technically Jaz meant for 70% to be good, and anythign above just gets better and better, however those of us who spent any time in the education system can't handle this ;)

Pistol Grip Pump In My Lap At All Times

Well, technically Jaz meant for 70% to be good, and anythign above just gets better and better, however those of us who spent any time in the education system can't handle this ;)

We could label the worst rating "Best", followed by "Bester" and "Bestest" and then step up the wording every two weeks or so.

'Yeah, That's what Jesus would do. Jesus would bomb Afghanistan. Yeah.' - snowlion

Well, technically Jaz meant for 70% to be good

If 70% werent so piss-yellow, I'd happily keep my mouth shut. But right now, I totally dislike the color of it. ;P

We could label the worst rating "Best", followed by "Bester" and "Bestest" and then step up the wording every two weeks or so.

Alternativly something like 'pure crap', 'much worse crap' and 'happy crapping around' would do, too.
Or we go out and use the jewelry/precious metal scale instead, like: 'cat shit' for worst, 'cat gold' = mediocre, 'pebble' = nice, and 'tinsel' for the most glorious stuff. ;)

cu, w0lf.

Fuck off the 30 seconds posting limit!

*smiles*

How about doin' it the Orwell way?

Double-plus-ungood, good, double-plus-good etc.

-Mel

Look at me! I'm a prostitute robot from the future!