Reading harold_maude's journal

Nov 01, 2005 04:06 # 40032

harold_maude *** posts about...

My theory on color, part 1

Text deleted.

It only looks that way because your standing on your head.

This post was edited by harold_maude on Nov 06, 2005.

Nov 01, 2005 18:59 # 40042

kylebellamy *** replies...

Re: My theory on color, part 1

I like everything about what you just said. It may be that my brain understands better or not but I found your explaination valid and logical given the leaps that you have to take to stay with the whole of the idea.

As I was reading, I was struck by this little bit:
"sound is experienced in wave form.
As it moves and shifts, which also makes it liquid, you feel the vibration of it's encounter with time."

For some reason, I don't think this works quite right. Sound, in and of itself is a lot like color being a reflection of light that is not absorbed byt the thing it bounces off of. Sound (I am an audio engineer of sorts) is actualy just a vibration using the air to travel. If you placed your hand on a train track and felt a far off train, that would not be "sound" but something very similiar.

Sound becomes sound where there is something to hear it. If a tree falls in a forest, but no one is around to hear it, does it make a sound? Technically, there was an animal somewhere around there that heard it.

But if you smack a steel bar into another in a vacuum, you will not hear any sound. Everything else is happening the same as if it were in a room full of air. So do they make a sound? No. I don't think so.

So basically, all of that just better fits with your description.

I know I'm dead on the surface But I'm screaming underneath

Nov 01, 2005 23:09 # 40048

harold_maude *** replies...

Re: My theory on color, part 1

?% | 1

Hopefully this will post before the computer goes nuts again.
It's been going out at will.
I hate viruses.

Anyway. Let's try this again. The question of time and it's true nature is something I've been searching and it's related to my studies in sacred geometry.
There is nothing static in nature.
Everything is subject to decay.

I started asking the question "what is time" The nature of time itself.
Not how it's measured to discribe what it is, but the very nature of time.

That question, like other questions similar to that have been roaming around in my head.

Before this shuts down again, I'm going to post this and then hopefully be able to continue.

It only looks that way because your standing on your head.

Nov 02, 2005 14:20 # 40065

kylebellamy *** replies...

Re: My theory on color, part 1

?% | 1

I love the fact that time is as fluid as anything else in nature. It can change based on how it relates to what is taking notice of it.

For instance, it has been theorized and I believe mathematically proven that if you head straight out from the earth, turn around and head back, time will have passed faster for the earth than it did for you. Not sure how that works but it has to do with relativity.

But a better description is the fabled classroom clock. An hour can take much longer there tan a whole weekend at your favorite place to be.

I know I'm dead on the surface But I'm screaming underneath


Small text Large text

Netalive Amp (Skin for Winamp)